Skip to content

Cfe04 config meta data v2 #162

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Nefarious46
Copy link
Contributor

Draft 2 of cfe 04 config.json metadata tables.
Applied changes suggested internally and in the previous draft PR.
last_chance_index on cfe_04_global stays varchar until better time.

@Nefarious46 Nefarious46 requested a review from kortemik May 19, 2025 09:43
@Nefarious46 Nefarious46 self-assigned this May 19, 2025
@Nefarious46 Nefarious46 added enhancement New feature or request review labels May 19, 2025
(
id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
cfe_04_id INT NOT NULL,
name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think name should be a reference to the same place that capture points it's indexes to, or something because these are essentially the same thing. i think it would be worth of some kind of meeting to sort this out.

(
id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY,
cfe_04_id INT NOT NULL,
name VARCHAR(255) NOT NULL,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think name should be a reference to the same place that capture points it's sourcetypes to, or something because these are essentially the same thing. i think it would be worth of some kind of meeting to sort this out.

@q22u q22u removed the review label May 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants