Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: WebAuthN support #966

Draft
wants to merge 129 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

feat: WebAuthN support #966

wants to merge 129 commits into from

Conversation

coolbueb
Copy link

Summary of change

(A few sentences about this PR)

Related issues

  • Link to issue1 here
  • Link to issue1 here

Test Plan

(Write your test plan here. If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your changes work. Bonus points for screenshots and videos!)

Documentation changes

(If relevant, please create a PR in our docs repo, or create a checklist here highlighting the necessary changes)

Checklist for important updates

  • Changelog has been updated
  • coreDriverInterfaceSupported.json file has been updated (if needed)
    • Along with the associated array in lib/ts/version.ts
  • frontendDriverInterfaceSupported.json file has been updated (if needed)
  • Changes to the version if needed
    • In package.json
    • In package-lock.json
    • In lib/ts/version.ts
  • Had run npm run build-pretty
  • Had installed and ran the pre-commit hook
  • If new thirdparty provider is added,
    • update switch statement in recipe/thirdparty/providers/configUtils.ts file, createProvider function.
    • add an icon on the user management dashboard.
  • Issue this PR against the latest non released version branch.
    • To know which one it is, run find the latest released tag (git tag) in the format vX.Y.Z, and then find the latest branch (git branch --all) whose X.Y is greater than the latest released tag.
    • If no such branch exists, then create one from the latest released branch.
  • If have added a new web framework, update the add-ts-no-check.js file to include that
  • If added a new recipe / api interface, then make sure that the implementation of it uses NON arrow functions only (like someFunc: function () {..}).
  • If added a new recipe, then make sure to expose it inside the recipe folder present in the root of this repo. We also need to expose its types.
  • If added a new entry point, then make sure that it is importable by adding it to the exports in package.json

Remaining TODOs for this PR

  • Item1
  • Item2

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Deploy Preview for astounding-pegasus-21c111 canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e6d11f2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/astounding-pegasus-21c111/deploys/67d3e7779e13270008628958

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Deploy Preview for precious-marshmallow-968a81 canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e6d11f2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/precious-marshmallow-968a81/deploys/67d3e7775e53d5000814441c

@@ -127,7 +150,7 @@ workflows:
tags:
only: /dev-v[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)*/
branches:
only: /test-cicd\/.*/
only: /test-cicd\/.*|feat\/webauthn\/base/
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please revert these

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

LINKING_TO_SESSION_USER_FAILED: {
EMAIL_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED:
"Cannot sign in / up due to security reasons. Please contact support. (ERR_CODE_013)",
"Cannot sign in / up due to security reasons. Please contact support. (ERR_CODE_26)",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please update the code to match the original format (3digits, leftpadded with 0)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Comment on lines 195 to 201
// If the loginmethod associated with the session has an email address, we move it to the top of the list (if it's already in the list)
if (sessionLoginMethod.email !== undefined && result.includes(sessionLoginMethod.email)) {
result = [
sessionLoginMethod.email,
...result.filter((email) => email !== sessionLoginMethod!.email),
];
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should keep this part.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants