Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

automation: services tests #13152

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yonasberhe23
Copy link
Contributor

@yonasberhe23 yonasberhe23 commented Jan 18, 2025

Summary

Fixes #rancher/qa-tasks#1581

This PR also includes small fixes to address flaky Extensions tests.

Checklist

  • The PR is linked to an issue and the linked issue has a Milestone, or no issue is needed
  • The PR has a Milestone
  • The PR template has been filled out
  • The PR has been self reviewed
  • The PR has a reviewer assigned
  • The PR has automated tests or clear instructions for manual tests and the linked issue has appropriate QA labels, or tests are not needed
  • The PR has reviewed with UX and tested in light and dark mode, or there are no UX changes

@yonasberhe23 yonasberhe23 self-assigned this Jan 18, 2025
@yonasberhe23 yonasberhe23 force-pushed the services_tests_e2e branch 4 times, most recently from bde4b16 to efa6db7 Compare January 22, 2025 19:49
@yonasberhe23 yonasberhe23 requested a review from izaac January 22, 2025 19:50
@yonasberhe23 yonasberhe23 force-pushed the services_tests_e2e branch 3 times, most recently from 9cda750 to e892ba2 Compare January 22, 2025 23:22
@yonasberhe23 yonasberhe23 marked this pull request as ready for review January 22, 2025 23:51
@yonasberhe23 yonasberhe23 added this to the v2.11.0 milestone Jan 23, 2025
@izaac izaac requested a review from a-arias January 23, 2025 20:54
@izaac
Copy link
Contributor

izaac commented Jan 23, 2025

@a-arias could you take a look at this too? 👍🏽

@izaac
Copy link
Contributor

izaac commented Jan 24, 2025

@yonasberhe23 Will this only cover external names ? In that case the task can be break down to smaller ones for cluster ip Headless loadBalancer nodePort

Other than that it looks good to me.

@izaac izaac added the QA/dev-automation Issues that engineers have written automation around so QA doesn't have look at this label Jan 24, 2025
Copy link

@a-arias a-arias left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

great job, I added 2 observations that could be potential improvements.

resourceDetail() {
return new ResourceDetailPo(this.self());
}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it would be good to add a little documentation on these methods to get a quick idea of what UI element they return

}

growlList() {
return this.self().find('.growl-list');
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is the classes the only way to get these elements? , we could use ids or a combination of classes and names with xpath to create stronger locator strategy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/e2e QA/dev-automation Issues that engineers have written automation around so QA doesn't have look at this
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants