Skip to content

Add test for final decorator independent of typing-extensions #723

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 14, 2025

Conversation

mauvilsa
Copy link
Member

Before submitting

  • Did you read the contributing guideline?
  • [n/a] Did you update the documentation? (readme and public docstrings)
  • Did you write unit tests such that there is 100% coverage on related code? (required for bug fixes and new features)
  • Did you verify that new and existing tests pass locally?
  • Did you make sure that all changes preserve backward compatibility?
  • [n/a] Did you update the CHANGELOG? (not for typos, docs, test updates, or minor internal changes/refactors)

@mauvilsa mauvilsa added the refactor Improvements to the quality of the code label May 14, 2025
Copy link

@mauvilsa mauvilsa merged commit df3050d into main May 14, 2025
27 checks passed
@mauvilsa mauvilsa deleted the final-decorator-test branch May 14, 2025 05:25
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.97%. Comparing base (5daf387) to head (fcbd1aa).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #723   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.97%   99.97%           
=======================================
  Files          22       22           
  Lines        6845     6845           
=======================================
  Hits         6843     6843           
  Misses          2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactor Improvements to the quality of the code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant