-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 148
Add error handling for default get-messages request and message parsing #180
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
nickfujita
wants to merge
2
commits into
cloudflare:main
Choose a base branch
from
nickfujita:add-error-handling
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
--- | ||
"agents": patch | ||
--- | ||
|
||
Add error handling for default /get-messages request & hook up option.onError and error return value. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's better to actually throw the error here, and expect the user to add an ErrorBoundary
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that might throw off many users, as it did me, because it doesn't seem to be the expected behavior for a hook to throw an error upon receiving a 40x response. For example, when using tanstack-query the standard behavior isn't to throw an error if the request fails, but rather to communicate the issue in the form of an
error
property on the return object, and leavingdata
as undefined (which maybe we should do here instead of returning an empty array 🤔).I don't think the underlying
userPartySocket
requires an ErrorBoundary either, but rather communitates errors via theonerror
property in it's return object.If there was a way to provide a typescript error when using this hook without a ErrorBoundary, that would probably make it more feasible, but I'm not currently aware of a way to add that.
Maybe adding a very clear note in the documentation that there needs to be an ErrorBoundary and updating the agent template repo might prevent users from running into this, but I just can't help but feel that there would be more people filing issues for this same thing in the future 😅