Skip to content

Bazel CI in Jenkins #7522

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vvbandeira
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 5, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 5, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@maliberty
Copy link
Member

@oharboe there is still some issue with the bazel-orfs test which uses docker inside the docker that Jenkins started. We can merge this with the knowledge that this particular test will fail for now or wait for Vitor to figure out a solution. We could also just run the src/test units for now.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 5, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@oharboe
Copy link
Collaborator

oharboe commented Jun 5, 2025

I think we need caching before we putit in production anyway, so might as well iterate on the PR

@maliberty
Copy link
Member

Without caching the runtime is no more than the regular build & test CI so putting it in parallel won't hurt. That is without the bazel-orfs which is currently failing but I don't expect to add too much time.

@oharboe
Copy link
Collaborator

oharboe commented Jun 5, 2025

I see.

Vitor Bandeira added 2 commits June 6, 2025 03:12
Signed-off-by: Vitor Bandeira <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Vitor Bandeira <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 6, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants