Skip to content

Update - log analysis tools #1747

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

yuvraajsj18
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@yuvraajsj18
Copy link
Member Author

Items to verify:

The data breach cost reduction claim is inaccurate. The article states "Organizations with comprehensive log analysis detect security incidents 200 days faster, reducing breach costs from $4.45M to $3.05M per incident." However, current 2024 data shows the global average breach cost is $4.88M, and early detection within 200 days reduces costs by 23%, not the specific $4.45M to $3.05M reduction claimed. The article should be updated to reflect the current $4.88M average and 23% cost reduction figure.

The specific performance metrics in the comparison matrix lack current validation. Claims like "SigNoz: 100,000+ events/second, <50ms query latency, 9:1 compression" and "Splunk: 1,200,000 events/second" are not supported by publicly available 2024-2025 performance data. Current sources indicate these specific performance benchmarks are not publicly disclosed, making the comparison matrix potentially misleading. The article should either provide sources for these metrics or indicate they are estimates/theoretical.

Compliance penalty claims are oversimplified. The article states "avoiding penalties averaging $2.9M per violation" but current data shows penalties vary dramatically by regulation: PCI-DSS ($5,000-$100,000/month), HIPAA (up to $1.5M/year), GDPR (up to €20M or 4% of global turnover). The $2.9M average doesn't reflect this variability and should be updated to show the range of penalties across different regulatory frameworks.

Enterprise downtime cost claim needs updating. The article claims "each prevented hour saving an estimated $301,000 for enterprise applications," but 2024-2025 data shows costs of $330,000/hour for general enterprises, with 44% reporting over $1M/hour and some reaching $5M/hour for large enterprises. The article should update to reflect current cost ranges: $330,000-$5M+ per hour depending on enterprise size.

Pricing information for cloud services appears outdated. The article shows AWS CloudWatch at "$0.50/GB ingested, $0.03/GB stored" and Azure Monitor at "$2.30-$7.40/GB," but current 2025 pricing should be verified as cloud pricing changes frequently. The article should include a disclaimer that cloud pricing is subject to change and readers should consult current vendor pricing pages.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 24, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
signoz-web ❌ Failed (Inspect) Jul 24, 2025 4:06pm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant