Skip to content

Update - open source log management #1746

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yuvraajsj18
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@yuvraajsj18
Copy link
Member Author

Items to verify:

The article claims Graylog's 2025 release introduced "Adversary Campaign Intelligence for threat detection, Data Lake Preview for enhanced data management, and Selective Data Restore capabilities." However, based on recent searches, while Graylog did introduce a consumption-based "Active Data" pricing model in 2025 and enhanced features like AI-assisted report generation and compliance automation, there is no verification of the specific features mentioned (Adversary Campaign Intelligence, Data Lake Preview, Selective Data Restore) in current sources. These specific feature claims should be verified or removed.

The performance benchmarks cited in the article cannot be verified through recent sources. Specifically: 1) SigNoz delivering "2.5x faster ingestion and 13x faster aggregation compared to ELK stack" - no recent benchmarks confirm these exact figures; 2) Vector processing "300,000+ events per second" - this specific number is not verified in current benchmarking data; 3) Loki achieving "60-80% lower storage costs" - while Loki is known for cost efficiency, these specific percentages are not confirmed by recent sources. These claims should either be updated with verifiable current benchmarks or qualified as estimates from older testing.

The article states "Recent performance testing reveals significant differences between platforms" and provides specific comparative numbers, but the searches indicate these may be from older benchmarks (some dating back to 2023). The performance comparison section should be updated with a disclaimer about the age of the benchmarks or replaced with more recent data, as performance characteristics can change significantly with new releases.

The article correctly mentions Logwatch but fails to note that it's primarily designed for single-server environments and periodic analysis rather than real-time monitoring. While the description is generally accurate, it could be clearer that Logwatch is not suitable for modern distributed logging needs and is more of a supplementary tool rather than a comprehensive log management solution.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 24, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
signoz-web ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 24, 2025 4:02pm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant