Skip to content

docs(example): remove import entries as they confuse new users #119

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dpetka2001
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes LazyVim/LazyVim#5854. Would be good to not mention import entries in example.lua, so that the LazyVim website docs don't mention them as they confuse new users, especially with the new warning about "wrong order".

@michaelbarton
Copy link

Thanks so much for creating a PR. I think these plugins are very useful, and I have been using them, so perhaps a future state in the documentation might suggest where is an appropriate place to put these imports?

@dpetka2001
Copy link
Contributor Author

There was a mention in the past, but like I said it got removed because new users were confused and that lead to issues. See #75. Users should just use the command :LazyExtras to avoid any such issues like yours. As they get accustomed to how things work in Lazyvim and lazy.nvim they will discover this feature and judge if they want to use it or not. I don't believe a future mention is necessary in my personal opinion, as it will only have the same effect as if these lines were not removed.

@dpetka2001
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually my PR is same as #52, but I'll leave it open, so that maintainer maybe notices it again and merges #52 instead of mine.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: Potential incorrect import of lazyvim extras in examples
2 participants