Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Go tooling UX wrapper (package management, profiling, etc) #12

Open
tj opened this issue Oct 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Go tooling UX wrapper (package management, profiling, etc) #12

tj opened this issue Oct 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
Go Program Suggestion for a command-line program

Comments

@tj
Copy link
Owner

tj commented Oct 8, 2019

I wrote this really half-assed thing a while back https://github.com/tj/go-search, but it could be interactive and generally much nicer. Maybe someone else has written one I'm not sure.

It'd also be nice to kind of "favorite" packages, when you evaluate a package and then later need the same thing I often forget which package I evaluated to be the best choice for a particular task. GH stars are ok for this but not great.

@tj tj added the Program Suggestion for a command-line program label Oct 8, 2019
@kc-dot-io
Copy link

Something like component for go? I really like this one too.

@tj
Copy link
Owner Author

tj commented Dec 13, 2019

Changed my mind about this, I think maybe a wrapper to the Go tooling in general might be nicer than just search.

The Go team doesn't seem too fond of making the UX nicer, stuff like go mod why is awkward, there's no way to list the versions of a package, search for packages, etc, so maybe a CLI which brings it more inline with npm, cargo and friends would be nice.

@tj tj changed the title Go command-line package search Go tooling UX wrapper (package management, profiling, etc) Dec 13, 2019
@tj tj added the Go label Feb 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Go Program Suggestion for a command-line program
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants