-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Component wireframe equivalents in DSM #283
Comments
language alignment, playbook, and purpose? (mockup vs wireframe, HF, LF) Doug: Whimsical | great, designers can collaborate via workspaces (getting new tool on hold) Varun: it's not only building, but also maintaining. TDS has 2 designers and might not have capacity to maintain Suggestions: sketch file |
@kittybourne do a quick POC to see the feasibility |
Created sketch file and uploaded to cloud for trial: https://sketch.cloud/s/zkoby |
hey Kitty! lets gather feedback for the existing state. @twirlingsky and @Christina-Lo can you signal boost! thank you : ) |
Feedback from R&L team (who use Site builder): The wireframe tools work great and meet over 90% of what we need. Would like to see more xs elements and maybe carousels, tables, hero, river flows... |
@kittybourne has made updates to the wireframe components recently and haven't gotten any further feedback |
updated link to sketch file https://www.sketch.com/s/0a44c93f-08e2-4ece-bc3c-1967e9163afd |
Problem Statement
Recommendation
Design intent
We need to align on how our wireframes look because stakeholders are getting confused about what is a wireframe.
Acceptance criteria
Wireframes are really basic and have no styling or details. Monochrome, boxes, lines and text.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: