You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Allow a package review to remain open for up to a year (on hold) with 3 month check-ins following
The author can choose to have their submission put on hold (editor applies the holding label). The holding status will be revisited every 3 months, and after one year, the issue will be closed if no movement has occurred on the review.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lwasser
changed the title
fix: update process
fix: update text around our on-hold process for packages where a maintainer hasn't responded in a period of time
Jan 6, 2025
When this is implemented, i think we also want to add text for when a reviewer goes quiet. That if they odn't respnd in a month, we will let them know that we will look for another reviewer. (with some clauses around what happens if the review is actually complete). if the reviewer's review is complete there may be a way to evaluate it and move forward
lwasser
changed the title
fix: update text around our on-hold process for packages where a maintainer hasn't responded in a period of time
fix: editor guide--update text around our on-hold process for packages where a maintainer hasn't responded in a period of time
Jun 11, 2025
lwasser
changed the title
fix: editor guide--update text around our on-hold process for packages where a maintainer hasn't responded in a period of time
enh: editor guide--update text around our on-hold process for packages where a maintainer hasn't responded in a period of time
Jun 11, 2025
Allow a package review to remain open for up to a year (on hold) with 3 month check-ins following
The author can choose to have their submission put on hold (editor applies the holding label). The holding status will be revisited every 3 months, and after one year, the issue will be closed if no movement has occurred on the review.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: