Skip to content

Warning Regarding Message Size Limit in Rudder Integration #7422

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
snipercorretor opened this issue Oct 12, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Warning Regarding Message Size Limit in Rudder Integration #7422

snipercorretor opened this issue Oct 12, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
in linear Issue or PR has been created in Linear for internal review Stale Issue was stale

Comments

@snipercorretor
Copy link

snipercorretor commented Oct 12, 2023

Describe the bug
During the execution of n8n, the following log entry was observed:
2023-10-11T21:38:57.992Z [Rudder] info: Your message must be < 32kb. This is currently surfaced as a warning.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

Go to 'n8n Dashboard'
Start or execute a workflow integrating with Rudder
Check the logs after execution
See the above-mentioned warning in the logs
Expected behavior
No warnings related to message size should be displayed during regular workflow execution.

Environment (please complete the following information):

OS: Debian Linux
n8n Version: latest
Database system: Postgres
Operation mode: queue

@snipercorretor snipercorretor changed the title Aviso Sobre Limite de Tamanho de Mensagem na Integração Rudder Warning Regarding Message Size Limit in Rudder Integration Oct 12, 2023
@Joffcom
Copy link
Member

Joffcom commented Oct 12, 2023

Hey @snipercorretor,

Thanks for the report, It looks like we might need to update our telemetry to not log any warnings. The good news is that this shouldn't break anything it just means your log output won't be pretty.

I have created an internal dev ticket which we are tracking as N8N-7005

@Joffcom Joffcom added the in linear Issue or PR has been created in Linear for internal review label Oct 12, 2023
@Joffcom
Copy link
Member

Joffcom commented Mar 17, 2025

We’re taking some time to review and tidy up our issue tracker. It looks like this issue hasn’t had any recent activity for the past 6 months. To keep our backlog focused on current priorities, we’re closing this issue for now.

That said, this doesn’t mean the issue is forgotten! If this is still relevant or you have more information to add, feel free to reopen it or create a new issue and we’d be happy to revisit it.

Thank you for understanding and for contributing to the project!

@Joffcom Joffcom added the Stale Issue was stale label Mar 17, 2025
@Joffcom Joffcom closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 17, 2025
@gardemm
Copy link

gardemm commented May 31, 2025

The error is still exists when extract xlsx files it becomes to infinite cycle

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in linear Issue or PR has been created in Linear for internal review Stale Issue was stale
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants