Skip to content

Audit required / init / abstract / sealed / etc. in protocol types #519

Open
@stephentoub

Description

@stephentoub

Our structure of these types is inconsistent. Some properties are set, others are init. Some base classes are abstract, others aren't. Some types are sealed, others aren't. There doesn't appear to be a rhyme or reason to most of it.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions