-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 838
website: Create Kubeflow Governance Section #4090
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@andreyvelich: Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here. If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
agree. this is a great way to recognize our community and provide more clear information. |
Yes, there should be a single source of truth and probably most of the community repository should just be on the website. |
Also, as this issue has been marked with "good first issue", I just want to warn any new contributors that there would be significant discussion on any such PR, and it would take a while to get merged. It's likely better if someone who has at least some knowledge of the community raises the PR, so they can participate in the discussion. Additionally, @andreyvelich @juliusvonkohout we need to agree what stuff will be on the website vs community repo. I think it's best to have governance documents versioned as markdown files on the community repo (with its associated permissions), and only have the website be a non-binding "summary", including list of groups/members, and links to the actual documents. |
I agree that the gov documents can be in the community repo for versioning. Initially, I expect the governance page just be very small that shows the 3 main entities of Kubeflow with their roles and members: For the KSC and WGs, we can just get information from here: https://www.kubeflow.org/docs/about/community/#kubeflow-steering-committee |
+1 |
+1 |
1 similar comment
+1 |
As part of CNCF graduation, we should define clear Kubeflow Governance structure: kubeflow/community#655
Right now, governance information is separated between
kubeflow/community
andkubeflow/website
.It would be nice to create dedicated Website page called Kubeflow Governance under About section: https://www.kubeflow.org/docs/about/, which summarize all Kubeflow committees and highlight members in those groups.
Similar to how Jupyter shows its governance overview: https://jupyter.org/governance/overview.html
For example, these sections can be in the governance section: https://www.kubeflow.org/docs/about/community/#kubeflow-steering-committee
Additionally, that will give folks recognition for the work they are doing.
Kubeflow Working Groups.
Kubeflow Outreach Committee
Kubeflow Steering Committee.
cc @kubeflow/kubeflow-steering-committee @varodrig @chasecadet @jbottum
/good-first-issue
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: